Oh dear January, why are you over?

It seems like my last blog post was just a few weeks ago instead of nearly two months! In case you do not remember, I had set myself a deadline for handing in my PhD and outlined how much work I have to do on the single parts of it. Well…. let’s try that again! January was not really productive for me. That might be related to the fact that I went to Iceland to take image of the Aurora, I had a conference I was helping to run, and most important of all, ran into some trouble with my PhD work!

Productivity January

My rescue time productivity overview for January. Having a week-long break just when you wanted to start writing does not help!

For part of my work (the part I thought I’d finish by Christmas…) I am using a suite of software (Move, Petrel, TrapTester), of which one is bound to a certain PC that I have to share with one of my supervisors (it’s his main workstation). Following some issues our IT department decided that it had to reset said PC… and to upgrade one of the three software packages. This ment that the three different packages did not communicate anymore and we had to update the other two as well. Which does not sound too hard and there shouldn’t go anything wrong with it, right? Wrong, it took us about a week to sort all of it out! On the bright side now I should be able to finish all my work on that part of my PhD in a few days (well… it now seems that the software I mainly use does not like what I want it to do. But that is something for another entry)!

The main issue I ran into was that the method I wanted to use in one of my three chapters – U-series dating – does not work with my samples 😦 ! That was a major setback as I had hoped that my rock samples from Arizona would be suitable for this method. It comes even more surprising as similar rocks from nearly the same place have been successfully dated by research group in New Mexico! Now I need to decide if I have time (and money) to pursuit a different dating method called cosmogenic nuclides or what else to do. It would be really exciting to do lab work and learn a new method, but then again I am already behind my self-set deadlines for writing up! And then there is the question of funding, the new method would not be cheap at all. At the moment the most likely outcome will be that I will have to write a big discussion on why the U-series dating did not work – something, between me and you, I wanted to avoid because it means to dig into some not trivial geochemistry! But, looking at how little time I have spent on writing in the last month, I do not think I can afford lab work :-/

Time I spent writing on my PhD thesis in January. Not a lot.

Time I spent writing on my PhD thesis in January. Not a lot.

But enough of the bad news, I still have sooooooo much time to write-up (91 days)! Here one of the images I was able to capture of the Aurora Borealis on Iceland, to make me feel better 😉

Aurora borealis on Iceland

Aurora borealis on Iceland.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s